Pilot Study of a Digital Behavioral Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Women.

IMPORTANCE: The burden and high prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) underline the urgent need for effective treatment. This study provides an initial look at an alternative approach to behavioral therapy for overactive bladder (OAB) that is delivered as an app on a smartphone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a digital therapeutic for OAB. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicentered prospective pilot study. We used a convenience sample (N = 30) from waiting lists of women referred for incontinence, excluding urinary tract infections, urinary retention, bladder pain syndrome, pelvic cancer, current pregnancy, kidney disease, dementia, stroke, and prior neuromodulation. The intervention, a smartphone app, provided an 8-week program with weekly modules combining evidence-based knowledge videos and skill-building exercises that incorporated behavioral therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, pelvic muscle training, and general health information. Combined scores on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included improvement in quality of life, based on International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire, a 72-hour urinary diary, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement. We evaluated usability with the Mobile Application Rating Scale. Statistical tests included Shapiro-Wilk tests and paired-sample t tests. RESULTS: Overall, 100% of participants reported a reduction in their OAB symptoms and 82% reported an improvement in quality of life. There was a significant improvement in diary parameters, including frequency (10.19-6.71 a day: SD, 1.25; P = 0.017) and incontinence (10-3.57: SD, 4.58). Participants rated the app highly on functionality, and 70% would recommend it. Patient Global Impression of Improvement improved for 72% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the application of a digital platform to over-come the real-world barriers for first-line treatment for OAB and offers information to inform further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the NUIG OAB App.

Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians?

PURPOSE: Physicians are urged to practice shared treatment decision making (STDM), yet this concept is poorly understood. We developed a conceptual framework describing essential characteristics of a shared approach. This study assessed the degree of congruence in the meanings of STDM as described in the framework and as perceived by practicing physicians. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was mailed to eligible Ontario medical and radiation oncologists and surgeons treating women with early-stage breast cancer. Open-ended and structured questions elicited physicians' perceptions of shared decision making. RESULTS: Most study physicians spontaneously described STDM using characteristics identified in the framework as essential to this concept. When presented with clinical examples in which the decision-making roles of physicians and patients were systematically varied, study physicians overwhelmingly identified example 4 as illustrating a shared approach. This example was deliberately constructed to depict STDM as defined in the framework. In addition, more than 85.0% of physicians identified as important to STDM specific patient and physician roles derived from the framework. These included the following: the physician gives information to the patient on treatment benefits and risks; the patient gives information to the physician about her values; the patient and physician discuss treatment options; both agree on the treatment to implement. CONCLUSION: Substantial congruence was found between the meaning of STDM as described in the framework and as perceived by study physicians. This supports use of the framework as a conceptual tool to guide research, compare different treatment decision-making approaches, clarify the meaning of STDM, and enhance its translation into practice.

Association between smoking during radiotherapy and prognosis in head and neck cancer: a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The study objective was to confirm a previous finding that patients with stage III/IV squamous head and neck cancer (SHNC) who smoke during radiotherapy (RT) experience reduced survival. METHODS: An observational cohort study. Patients' smoking status was assessed weekly by questionnaire plus blood cotinine. Patients were assessed every 3 to 4 months for survival. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to detect the independent contribution of smoking on survival. RESULTS: Of 148 patients, 113 smoked during RT. Blood cotinine and smoking questionnaire responses were highly correlated (Spearman R = .69; p < .0005). Abstainers and very light smokers experienced better survival than light, moderate, and heavy smokers (median, 42 vs 29 months; p = .07). Tumor and nodal status and years smoked were the most important prognostic factors. Smoking during RT was not an independent predictor of survival, but baseline smoking status was (p = .016). CONCLUSION: Smoking status should be documented in all future trials of RT in SHNC to allow for pooled analyses with sufficient power to address this question.